Blog powered by TypePad

Sponsor

  • 3
  • Two
  • one

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

« Paint it white | Main | Both sides now... »

Jun 15, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553aacb3188330115701dfcb9970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Encouraging news...but little of it:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ed Crooks

Further to our discussion below about shale gas:
http://nohotair.typepad.co.uk/no_hot_air/2009/06/the-ft-discovers-shale-gas.html

...the FT covered the Statoil / Chesapeake deal seven months ago, here:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ccb003c2-b028-11dd-a795-0000779fd18c.html

All the best

Ed

Gas Guru

But the FT missed the recent things that Statoil have been saying about shale outside North America (and a new story today from Exxon about Dutch gas).

I'm no geologist. But I look at maps of North American shale and say how on earth could there NOT be similar plays elsewhere in the world. Imagine one Barnett shale size find in China for example: The LNG market to China will disappear within two years, and what kind of impact will that have on prices? Shale is the story I'd like the FT to start covering. Very few people in the UK have ever heard of it. They still believe there is a shortage. I mentioned this to alleged energy expert recently and he had never heard of it. Peak Oil and all that rubbish is so 2006. What is particularly fun about shale is how people as divergent as Greenspan and Greenpeace both got it all so horribly wrong!

I love shale stories because I have a fascination for how the conventional wisdom was so incredibly wrong. Schadenfreude is a bit of it sure, but who's to say that that isn't a damn good reason, and an entertaining one.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment